Prohibition and post-Repeal licensing favored a smaller, consolidated distilling industry
Prohibition and post-Repeal licensing favored a smaller, consolidated distilling industry

Prohibition and post-Repeal licensing favored a smaller, consolidated distilling industry

Annotation

Use as corroboration. Specific company counts and geography should be checked against independent histories.

Challenges Claims
Context

A compact secondary synthesis of the mechanisms that prevented the pre-Prohibition industry from returning after repeal.

Excerpt ID
1021
Excerpt Text

The authors argue that Prohibition removed distilleries and urban production, while medicinal-whiskey survival, high post-Repeal licensing costs, and ownership consolidation favored a small number of large producers.

Locator End

Locator Start

PDF sheet 92 (displayed p. 59)

Locator Type
Page
Originating Working Notes
Page (text)
Source
No access
Source Section

Chapter 2 — Prohibition, Repeal, and consolidation

Verification Notes

Verified against complete extracted text and rendered PDF sheet 92.

Verification Status
Verified

Evidence unit

The authors argue that Prohibition removed plants and urban production, while medicinal-whiskey privileges, high post-Repeal licensing costs, and ownership consolidation favored a smaller number of well-financed producers.

Locator

Chapter 2, PDF sheet 92, displayed page 59.

Research use

Corroborates the claim that Repeal did not restore the pre-Prohibition production system.

Reliability boundary

Specific company counts, survivor lists, and geographic claims require independent historical verification.