Coded comparison should be used both to challenge attachment to self-created formulas and to prevent production labels, age, rarity, or recipe identity from determining component selection.
Blinding does not eliminate sensory fatigue, expectation from known components, or disagreement between tasters. Repeated sessions and a defined disagreement rule are still required.
Creator bias and prestige bias operate at different stages. Glaser motivates blind retasting of prototypes; Elliott uses blind barrel selection and reports choosing from all ten recipes. Coded comparison should include the unmodified base and prior prototypes, with metadata revealed only after sensory judgment.
Strengthened with the Four Roses / Brent Elliott source cluster on 2026-08-29.
A Zettel is one durable idea in your own words—not a quotation, source summary, or draft-book claim.
Atomic idea
State one complete idea. It should be understandable on its own and specific enough to connect to other notes.
Reasoning
Explain why the idea is true or useful in Rationale and Implications. Record meaningful objections or exceptions in Counterpoints.
Provenance
Connect one or more Literature Notes. Direct source relations are legacy-only; trace evidence through the literature-note and excerpt chain.
Connections
Apply approved Tags for retrieval and one or more Themes only when the note genuinely advances those interpretive threads.
Maturity checklist
September 12 transcript evidence — qualified application
Use as a worked lesson in precise recipe capture and expectation bias, with four total distinct reconstructible two-bottle recipes across Parts 1–2.
Do it Yourself Whiskey — Part 2 — analysis ·
YT-06 — located evidence and claim cautions
These are fully read supplied transcripts, not audio-verified videos or controlled experiments. Existing atomic statement and maturity are unchanged; missing recipe quantities and mechanistic claims remain restricted.