Do not apply 63.5% filling practice to bourbon, infer a universal 7°C haze threshold, or assume proof inevitably decreases in every climate. Acid-to-aldehyde oxidation wording and absence-of-acids claim need checking. These maturation discussions do not establish a consumer blend rest period.
The review discusses terpene isomers, fill strength, changing extraction rates, esterification, temperature and haze. These are relevant context for why aroma cannot be predicted from ingredient proportions alone.
Section 4.4.4
Section 4.4.4
Checked against complete publisher HTML September 8. Verified means fidelity to the source and explicit cautions, not endorsement of disputed source claims. Actual figures and original-file preservation remain pending.
No access → No access
Evidence
The review discusses terpene isomers, fill strength, changing extraction rates, esterification, temperature and haze. These are relevant context for why aroma cannot be predicted from ingredient proportions alone.
Location and context
Section 4.4.4 in the publisher review. This is a paraphrase, not a quotation or independent replication.
Annotation
Do not apply 63.5% filling practice to bourbon, infer a universal 7°C haze threshold, or assume proof inevitably decreases in every climate. Acid-to-aldehyde oxidation wording and absence-of-acids claim need checking. These maturation discussions do not establish a consumer blend rest period.
Traceability
Verified for fidelity to the accessed HTML. Actual figures and complete original-file preservation remain unresolved.