The authors favor innovation within local standards and cite 79 works. The review is not a new controlled experiment or a systematic meta-analysis. References should be reconciled with existing sources and read independently before stronger claims are made; no external funding and no conflicts are declared, with a scholarship acknowledged.
14
11
Conclusions, disclosures and references
Full indexed text/table/figure reviewed; author summary and researcher caveats distinguished. Original archive hold remains.
No access
Evidence
Paraphrase and research assessment, not a direct quotation.
The authors favor innovation within local standards and cite 79 works. The review is not a new controlled experiment or a systematic meta-analysis. References should be reconciled with existing sources and read independently before stronger claims are made; no external funding and no conflicts are declared, with a scholarship acknowledged.
Location and context
PDF pp.11–14; Conclusions, disclosures and references.
Annotation
Narrative review findings remain attributed. Primary studies were not independently replicated. Original PDF archival preservation is still blocked; Figure1 is locally preserved and reviewed.
Verification checklist
Capture evidence faithfully. Select one Source, record a usable locator, and preserve enough surrounding context to prevent misquotation.
Evidence
Paste the exact quote, paraphrase, statistic, definition, or source claim into Excerpt Text. Use Excerpt Type to distinguish quotation from interpretation.
Location and context
Record Locator Type, Locator Start, Locator End when needed, and Source Section. Explain the surrounding argument in Context.
Annotation
In Annotation, state why this evidence matters. Add approved Tags for retrieval and connect it to every relevant Literature Note.