The review surveys cereal malting, alternative starch sources, roasted malt, smoke sources and experimental cane/barley or chestnut spirits. Yield and flavor observations from individual experiments do not establish that all products qualify as whiskey or that the same materials improve consumer blends.
5
4
Section 2, Raw Materials and Malts
Full indexed text/table/figure reviewed; author summary and researcher caveats distinguished. Original archive hold remains.
No access
Evidence
Paraphrase and research assessment, not a direct quotation.
The review surveys cereal malting, alternative starch sources, roasted malt, smoke sources and experimental cane/barley or chestnut spirits. Yield and flavor observations from individual experiments do not establish that all products qualify as whiskey or that the same materials improve consumer blends.
Location and context
PDF pp.4–5; Section 2, Raw Materials and Malts.
Annotation
Narrative review findings remain attributed. Primary studies were not independently replicated. Original PDF archival preservation is still blocked; Figure1 is locally preserved and reviewed.
Verification checklist
Espitia-López 2024 IN3 — Alternative raw-material research is context-specific
Capture evidence faithfully. Select one Source, record a usable locator, and preserve enough surrounding context to prevent misquotation.
Evidence
Paste the exact quote, paraphrase, statistic, definition, or source claim into Excerpt Text. Use Excerpt Type to distinguish quotation from interpretation.
Location and context
Record Locator Type, Locator Start, Locator End when needed, and Source Section. Explain the surrounding argument in Context.
Annotation
In Annotation, state why this evidence matters. Add approved Tags for retrieval and connect it to every relevant Literature Note.