Treat firsts and quantities as research leads, not new corroboration. The account is secondary, simplified and strongly Kentucky-centered; the acknowledgments identify adaptation from heritage documentation. Distinguish speculation and traditional credit from evidence.
Original PDF pagination, not ebook reader counters. Attributed paraphrase.
The historical overview discusses colonial beer, wine, rum and grain spirits, migration, household production and river commerce. It gives Kieft 1640, Boston rum 1657, Mennonites 1683, immigration 1716–1733, an explicitly qualified Evan Williams 1783 tradition, and the 1795 Pinckney treaty. It reports 500 Kentucky distilleries in 1792 and 2,000 with 2.2 million gallons in 1810.
27
25
Colonial distilling and Kentucky trade
All supplied pages read; source fidelity only, not independent factual authentication.
No access › The Maker’s Mark Story — full-source analysis, PDF 1–59
Evidence
The historical overview discusses colonial beer, wine, rum and grain spirits, migration, household production and river commerce. It gives Kieft 1640, Boston rum 1657, Mennonites 1683, immigration 1716–1733, an explicitly qualified Evan Williams 1783 tradition, and the 1795 Pinckney treaty. It reports 500 Kentucky distilleries in 1792 and 2,000 with 2.2 million gallons in 1810.
Location and context
Original PDF 25–27; Colonial distilling and Kentucky trade. Attributed paraphrase, not a direct quotation.
Annotation
Treat firsts and quantities as research leads, not new corroboration. The account is secondary, simplified and strongly Kentucky-centered; the acknowledgments identify adaptation from heritage documentation. Distinguish speculation and traditional credit from evidence.
Verification
Source fidelity and page range checked. Independent historical verification remains separate.
Whitaker 2017 — Colonial distilling and Kentucky trade — PDF 25–27