Not a canonical legal or scientific reference. Definitions are often compressed; heads names methane; all sugar spirits are not thereby rum; no-water barrel-strength claim needs regulatory nuance; chill haze lacks an absolute universal 46 percent cutoff; alligator char and tongues are not exhaustive systems. Treat unsupported glossaries as source claims, not operational rules.
Carlton, 2017, first edition. E-reader screen captures; not printed page numbers.
The glossary spans char, evaporation, backset, barrel proof, bonded whiskey, cooperage, chill filtration, stills and cuts, finishing, sensory terms, mash bills, moonshine, proof, warehouses, straight whiskey, rye, wheat whiskey and wheated bourbon. It is useful for locating the author's terminology alongside production and tasting chapters.
Original PDF screen 272
Original PDF screen 264
Appendix A — glossary
Paraphrase checked in full-source reading with visual review. Verified means fidelity to this supplied source, not independent confirmation. Not a canonical legal or scientific reference. Definitions are often compressed; heads names methane; all sugar spirits are not thereby rum; no-water barrel-strength claim needs regulatory nuance; chill haze lacks an absolute universal 46 percent cutoff; alligator char and tongues are not exhaustive systems. Treat unsupported glossaries as source claims, not operational rules.
Evidence
The glossary spans char, evaporation, backset, barrel proof, bonded whiskey, cooperage, chill filtration, stills and cuts, finishing, sensory terms, mash bills, moonshine, proof, warehouses, straight whiskey, rye, wheat whiskey and wheated bourbon. It is useful for locating the author's terminology alongside production and tasting chapters.
Location and context
Appendix A — glossary. Original PDF screens 264–272; these are capture indices, not printed pagination. 
Annotation
Not a canonical legal or scientific reference. Definitions are often compressed; heads names methane; all sugar spirits are not thereby rum; no-water barrel-strength claim needs regulatory nuance; chill haze lacks an absolute universal 46 percent cutoff; alligator char and tongues are not exhaustive systems. Treat unsupported glossaries as source claims, not operational rules.