Content
Citation(s) & Footnote(s)
Book(s)No access
Collins Lewis. 2013. Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy 1(1):1004. All seven PDF pages read, including twenty references. No original experiment, systematic search or quantitative causal model: interpretive historical review applying attribution/scapegoat theory.
Coverage and argument
PDF1 frames changing colonial attitudes and the author's failure-of-prohibition thesis. PDF2 treats communal drinking controls, rum-to-whiskey transition, Rush and Benezet, frontier individualism and immigration. PDF3 traces church temperance, abstinence, state prohibition and brewery-linked saloons. PDF4 uses Kansas, the Benson Act, medicinal exceptions, enforcement resistance and municipal fines as an anticipatory case. PDF5 summarizes and introduces attribution theory. PDF6 develops scapegoating and changing representations of drinkers; acknowledges that Part 2 will discuss public-health benefits and economic effects. PDF7 completes references.
Author argues reformers overattributed social problems to alcohol while neglecting context. Researcher interpretation: useful as a clearly attributed interpretive lens, not proof that all reformers ignored poverty or that alcohol itself has no causal effects. The paper supplies no test of reformers' cognition, no systematic coding and no counterfactual evaluation of national prohibition. Part 2 is not included; do not claim the promised analysis was processed.
Publication cautions
PDF2 prints rum at 50–100 percent alcohol and a first Boston distillery in 1700. PDF3 compresses Maine-law chronology into 1846. PDF4 says the Volstead Act passed in 1920. These statements need independent chronology/technical checking before reuse; do not use this paper as definitive first-event evidence. Broad assertions about safe water, labor safety, ethnic groups, universal colonial attitudes and temperance origins need qualification. Quotations from Levine, Lender/Martin, Bader, Okrent and others are secondary quotations and must be checked at originals before presenting as primary quotations.
Useful located evidence
- PDF3: shifts from temperance to abstinence and legal prohibition; saloons' commercial and community roles. Attribute this compressed narrative to Lewis, corroborate dates separately.
- PDF4: Kansas prescription and enforcement exceptions illustrate divergence between law on paper and local practice; actual dates/statistics require underlying Kansas sources.
- PDF5–6: attribution/scapegoat interpretation, and a changing image of the drunkard from victim to menace. Theoretical interpretation, not experimentally demonstrated history.
Preserved Source 3d9551ad82f18190912bdadc4ec6d328.
