Thorne abstract is not complete Nettleton1894paper;1913book is a separate later source.
Comparative historical evidence; source layers and limitations are recorded in the related Literature Note.
Barker identifies the flavor entry as Thorne's abstract of Nettleton's paper, rather than the complete paper. The entry preserves discussion and disagreement about process and maturation.
24
20
Nettleton, abstracted by L. T. Thorne (1894), as reproduced by Barker
Fresh review29September2026 against277-page PDF SHA256 f074ba4591588123783daec22e0bdc4e031635dd3ae77ec8acf1ac220b748195. All pages read/visually surveyed;71details. Original periodicals uncollated. Thorne abstract is not complete Nettleton1894paper;1913book is a separate later source.
Paraphrase
Barker identifies the flavor entry as Thorne's abstract of Nettleton's paper, rather than the complete paper. The entry preserves discussion and disagreement about process and maturation.
Evidence trail
Verification concerns fidelity to this reproduction, not independent validation of its claims.