Lahne, Jacob, and Keith Cadwallader. “Streamlined Analysis of Potent Odorants in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: The Case of Tequila.” In Flavor Chemistry of Wine and Other Alcoholic Beverages, edited by Michael C. Qian and Thomas H. Shellhammer. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2012.
In one 40% ABV añejo tequila, direct-injection sample dilution analysis and extraction-based AEDA overlapped on prominent odorants, but SDA missed more odor peaks and had lower dilution resolution. The authors recommend further sensory validation.
Jacob Lahne and Keith Cadwallader, “Streamlined Analysis of Potent Odorants in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: The Case of Tequila,” in Flavor Chemistry of Wine and Other Alcoholic Beverages, ed. Michael C. Qian and Thomas H. Shellhammer (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2012), supplied PDF pp. 41–54.
Jacob Lahne and Keith Cadwallader, “Streamlined Analysis of Potent Odorants in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: The Case of Tequila,” in Flavor Chemistry of Wine and Other Alcoholic Beverages, ed. Michael C. Qian and Thomas H. Shellhammer (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2012), supplied PDF pp. 41–54.
54
41
Lahne and Cadwallader, “Streamlined Analysis,” supplied PDF 41–54.
Streamlined analysis of potent odorants
Re-audited September 11, 2026. Methodological comparison, not proof that the methods are equivalent or that consumer proof normalization follows the same protocol. PDF sequence rather than printed pagination.
No access
Source and locator
Lahne and Cadwallader, chapter3; abstract PDF41, methods50–51, comparison52–54. AEDA used a concentrated extract; SDA used the beverage diluted with ethanol.
Formatted outputs
Jacob Lahne and Keith Cadwallader, “Streamlined Analysis of Potent Odorants in Distilled Alcoholic Beverages: The Case of Tequila,” in Flavor Chemistry of Wine and Other Alcoholic Beverages, ed. Michael C. Qian and Thomas H. Shellhammer (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2012), supplied PDF pp. 41–54.
Usage map
Prepared for retrieval through the linked excerpt and LIT-252. No new manuscript placement is asserted.
Methodological comparison, not proof that the methods are equivalent or that consumer proof normalization follows the same protocol.