Dills, Angela K., and Jeffrey A. Miron. “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis.” NBER Working Paper 9681, May 2003. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9681.
The authors compare a federal prohibition indicator with real enforcement expenditure and vary tax controls, including interactions. The 1917–1919 indicator does not separately identify influenza, wartime restrictions, immigration or stockpiling effects. Such explanations remain hypotheses.
Dills, Angela K., and Jeffrey A. Miron. “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis.” NBER Working Paper 9681, May 2003. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9681. Printed pp.16–20; PDF18–22; Tables8–9/PDF36–37.
20
16
Dills and Miron, “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis,” 16–20.
PDF18–22; Tables8–9/PDF36–37
Citation-ready for this attributed, qualified paraphrase of the2003working paper; not blanket factual corroboration.
No access
Source and locator
Dills, Angela K., and Jeffrey A. Miron. “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis.” NBER Working Paper 9681, May 2003. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9681.
Printed pp.16–20; PDF18–22; Tables8–9/PDF36–37.
Formatted outputs
Dills and Miron, “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis,” 16–20.
Usage map
The authors compare a federal prohibition indicator with real enforcement expenditure and vary tax controls, including interactions. The 1917–1919 indicator does not separately identify influenza, wartime restrictions, immigration or stockpiling effects. Such explanations remain hypotheses.
Dills–Miron DM5 — Federal estimates depend on controls and model design