Dills, Angela K., and Jeffrey A. Miron. “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis.” NBER Working Paper 9681, May 2003. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9681.
The state-panel models use fixed effects, year indicators, lagged mortality and population weights. State prohibition coefficients of .238, .307 and -.089 differ across periods. Policy endogeneity and omitted state-time factors limit causal conclusions; these regressions were not independently reproduced.
Dills, Angela K., and Jeffrey A. Miron. “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis.” NBER Working Paper 9681, May 2003. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9681. Printed pp.13–16; PDF15–18; Table7/PDF35.
16
13
Dills and Miron, “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis,” 13–16.
PDF15–18; Table7/PDF35
Citation-ready for this attributed, qualified paraphrase of the2003working paper; not blanket factual corroboration.
No access
Source and locator
Dills, Angela K., and Jeffrey A. Miron. “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis.” NBER Working Paper 9681, May 2003. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9681.
Printed pp.13–16; PDF15–18; Table7/PDF35.
Formatted outputs
Dills and Miron, “Alcohol Prohibition and Cirrhosis,” 13–16.
Usage map
The state-panel models use fixed effects, year indicators, lagged mortality and population weights. State prohibition coefficients of .238, .307 and -.089 differ across periods. Policy endogeneity and omitted state-time factors limit causal conclusions; these regressions were not independently reproduced.
Dills–Miron DM4 — State regressions are sensitive to period and specification