![[SRC-126] Figure 9 arithmetic and dimensional audit](https://images.spr.so/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/j42No7y-dcokJuNgXeA0ig/f9faaa5a-12e7-445b-ab82-4c95c0f0f700/attachment-4c9836e8-5dbd-420f-8f7b-ee710b211b04-us_whiskey_academy/w=1920,quality=90,fit=scale-down)
Livermore, Don. “Blending Canadian Whisky – A Review.” The Journal of Distilling Science 2, no. 1 (2023): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.61855/JDS0201.04. Printed issue label: Winter 2022; publisher date: March 1, 2023.
Figure 9 prints a 10,000-liter, 40-percent-ABV target and a bourbon component at 1 percent of alcohol, 48.2 percent ABV and 114.1 liters; these inputs are inconsistent.
Livermore, Don. “Blending Canadian Whisky – A Review.” The Journal of Distilling Science 2, no. 1 (2023): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.61855/JDS0201.04. Printed issue label: Winter 2022; publisher date: March 1, 2023. PDF 7–8, printed 54–55.
PDF 8; printed 55
PDF 7; printed 54
Livermore 2023, 54–55.
Figure 9 and proof adjustment discussion
Source and locator verified. Researcher calculation: 10,000 × 0.40 × 0.01 ÷ 0.482 = 82.98755 liters, not 114.1. The printed volume contributes 54.9962 liters of alcohol instead of 40. Summed printed alcohol contributions are approximately 4,015.0339 liters versus the 4,000 target. Which input the author intended is unresolved. Printed density units L/kg conflict with multiplication to obtain kg. Do not deploy this table or infer exact final ABV from summed volumes; contraction and temperature matter.
No access / 
Source and locator
PDF 7–8; printed 54–55. Figure 9 and proof adjustment discussion.
Evidence:
Formatted outputs
Livermore, Don. “Blending Canadian Whisky – A Review.” The Journal of Distilling Science 2, no. 1 (2023): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.61855/JDS0201.04. Printed issue label: Winter 2022; publisher date: March 1, 2023.
Usage map
Researcher calculation: 10,000 × 0.40 × 0.01 ÷ 0.482 = 82.98755 liters, not 114.1. The printed volume contributes 54.9962 liters of alcohol instead of 40. Summed printed alcohol contributions are approximately 4,015.0339 liters versus the 4,000 target. Which input the author intended is unresolved. Printed density units L/kg conflict with multiplication to obtain kg. Do not deploy this table or infer exact final ABV from summed volumes; contraction and temperature matter.
Ready for this qualified source reference, not marked Used in a public draft.