Researcher paraphrase of the section's central contribution; detailed qualifications and corrections are in the related Literature Note.
Printed pp. 81–98; physical PDF 86–103.
A cut decision becomes interpretable when sensory observations are tied to sample conditions, process measurements and the intended spirit.
98
81
Sensory Cut Decisions Need Comparable Samples and Records
Located in the user-supplied scan during complete reading; all page thumbnails and selected detailed figures checked. Verified describes faithful source location, not blanket factual endorsement.
A cut decision becomes interpretable when sensory observations are tied to sample conditions, process measurements and the intended spirit.
Locator: printed pp. 81–98; PDF 86–103.
The second part of Chapter 3 compares sensory decisions with clock time, collection volume, distillate strength and temperature. Each measurement answers a different question. A time marker can be repeatable only if upstream wash and operating conditions are sufficiently repeatable. Output ABV supplies useful context but does not summarize every congener.
This is original paraphrase, not a direct quotation. See the linked note for critical assessment and course application.