Useful for the pre-distillation bridge and for resisting the simplistic claim that everyone drank only because water was unsafe.
PDF 23 Laussel relief is interpretive iconography, not residue proof; Jiahu, Iranian and Armenian dates are source-reported leads. Notes 283–285 give McGovern, Barnard, Gately, Dietler and Pollan routes. Washington/Hessian, Twain and Appleseed anecdotes require primary verification; p 41 death statistic conflicts with p 201.
The chapter surveys early fermented beverages, other intoxicants, nutritional and preservation arguments, and culturally costly drinking. It accepts practical functions but challenges them as a complete explanation, noting that populations also drank or mixed in water.
PDF 42
PDF 22
Chapter 1, early evidence and rival accounts
Verified as a paraphrase of the supplied PDF, not independent validation of its underlying claims. Endnotes included in interpretation. PDF ordinal pagination, not print pages.
No access → 
Evidence
The chapter surveys early fermented beverages, other intoxicants, nutritional and preservation arguments, and culturally costly drinking. It accepts practical functions but challenges them as a complete explanation, noting that populations also drank or mixed in water.
Location and context
Chapter 1, early evidence and rival accounts; supplied PDF pages 22–42. These are file page numbers, not print pagination.
PDF 23 Laussel relief is interpretive iconography, not residue proof; Jiahu, Iranian and Armenian dates are source-reported leads. Notes 283–285 give McGovern, Barnard, Gately, Dietler and Pollan routes. Washington/Hessian, Twain and Appleseed anecdotes require primary verification; p 41 death statistic conflicts with p 201.
Annotation
Useful for the pre-distillation bridge and for resisting the simplistic claim that everyone drank only because water was unsafe.
Citation:
Verification checklist
Verified means faithful capture, not independent confirmation of the book's claims.