The review mislabels 160 proof as a bottling condition. The separately checked 27 CFR 5.143 identifies 160 proof as the maximum distillation proof for bourbon and the listed grain types, with entry into new charred oak at no more than 125 proof; the class bottling minimum is 80 proof. Do not copy the review's wording into reference material.
2
2
Table 1, United States row
Full indexed text/table/figure reviewed; author summary and researcher caveats distinguished. Original archive hold remains.
No access
Evidence
Paraphrase and research assessment, not a direct quotation.
The review mislabels 160 proof as a bottling condition. The separately checked 27 CFR 5.143 identifies 160 proof as the maximum distillation proof for bourbon and the listed grain types, with entry into new charred oak at no more than 125 proof; the class bottling minimum is 80 proof. Do not copy the review's wording into reference material.
Location and context
PDF pp.2–2; Table 1, United States row.
Correction checked separately against 27 CFR 5.143(a) and Table 1(c)(2). The correction is not attributed to the review itself.
Annotation
Narrative review findings remain attributed. Primary studies were not independently replicated. Original PDF archival preservation is still blocked; Figure1 is locally preserved and reviewed.
Verification checklist
Capture evidence faithfully. Select one Source, record a usable locator, and preserve enough surrounding context to prevent misquotation.
Evidence
Paste the exact quote, paraphrase, statistic, definition, or source claim into Excerpt Text. Use Excerpt Type to distinguish quotation from interpretation.
Location and context
Record Locator Type, Locator Start, Locator End when needed, and Source Section. Explain the surrounding argument in Context.
Annotation
In Annotation, state why this evidence matters. Add approved Tags for retrieval and connect it to every relevant Literature Note.