Researcher critique: that case does not demonstrate a prespecified similarity margin. Recount of100 rows confirms23/27 matched and22/28 unmatched same/different responses, while five correctness labels are wrong.
Sensory Evaluation Techniques, fifth edition. Printed page locators; main-text PDF sheet=printed page+31.
The unified approach distinguishes difference and similarity objectives using declared risks and meaningful difference. The final mouthwash case instead recommends substitution after a non-significant difference test.
89
79
Chapter7; counterexample chapter20 pp567–571
Verified for faithful representation of inspected source and explicitly identified researcher critique; not blanket validation of source claims.
Located Evidence
The unified approach distinguishes difference and similarity objectives using declared risks and meaningful difference. The final mouthwash case instead recommends substitution after a non-significant difference test.
Interpretation And Boundary
Researcher critique: that case does not demonstrate a prespecified similarity margin. Recount of100 rows confirms23/27 matched and22/28 unmatched same/different responses, while five correctness labels are wrong.
Source: No access
Full review: 
Locators: printed pp.79–89; Chapter7; counterexample chapter20 pp567–571.