Author’s historical interpretation and stakeholder dispute; not endorsement of alleged health harms or proof that all single malts were unapproachable.
Located passage in Morgan’s2020 corporate-commissioned secondary history. Author’s historical interpretation and stakeholder dispute; not endorsement of alleged health harms or proof that all single malts were unapproachable.
Morgan describes blends of malt and lighter grain whisky as broadening Scotch’s appeal and affordability, while Highland malt interests challenged their legitimacy, labeling and legal status.
PDF page 123
PDF page 121
Chapter 5 — The Triumph of Blended Scotch Whisky
Fresh full-book audit: paraphrase checked against physical PDF pages 121–123 of the336-page supplied PDF. Author’s historical interpretation and stakeholder dispute; not endorsement of alleged health harms or proof that all single malts were unapproachable. Reading does not independently verify every original archive cited by Morgan.
Capture evidence faithfully. Select one Source, record a usable locator, and preserve enough surrounding context to prevent misquotation.
Evidence
Paste the exact quote, paraphrase, statistic, definition, or source claim into Excerpt Text. Use Excerpt Type to distinguish quotation from interpretation.
Location and context
Record Locator Type, Locator Start, Locator End when needed, and Source Section. Explain the surrounding argument in Context.
Annotation
In Annotation, state why this evidence matters. Add approved Tags for retrieval and connect it to every relevant Literature Note.