Useful as historical synthesis; state counts, current rules, and legal conclusions are time-bound and must be checked against current or primary authorities.
The chapter connects the Twenty-First Amendment's state authority to varied post-1933 regulatory regimes.
Garrett Peck describes how post-repeal policymakers used producer, wholesaler, and retailer separation in license states and state distribution or retail control in control states, creating a new regulated alcohol order rather than restoring the vertically integrated pre-Prohibition market.
PDF sheet 176
PDF sheet 174
Myth 9 — Post-repeal regulation
Verified against the sequential extracted-text review and rendered PDF sheets 174–176 on 2026-08-27. Evidence is paraphrased or described; chapter authorship, scope, and corroboration limits are preserved.
Verified atomic evidence from a user-supplied Source. The evidence is stored as a concise paraphrase, table description, or source-claim statement so the knowledge system remains useful without reproducing extended copyrighted text.
Evidence
Use Excerpt Text as the evidence statement and Excerpt Type to distinguish paraphrase, table, and source claim.
Location and context
Locator Start, Locator End, Source Section, and Context identify the rendered PDF passage and prevent the evidence from being detached from the chapter author's argument.
Interpretation boundary
Annotation states the knowledge-system use. Linked Claims must not exceed the passage, and quantitative, legal, causal, comparative, market, or policy statements remain attributed or qualified where required.