Reviewer calculation from reported data, not corrected raw measurement. Rounded coefficient uncertainty does not plausibly account for these large discrepancies; retain source and flag unresolved reporting.
Using Table1 coding and the full printed polynomial coefficients at Table3 settings gives UT DPPH approximately78.10 rather than the reported54.75, and US TFC approximately0.837 rather than1.29. UT TPC lack-of-fit p=.0126 is also significant at.05.
5
3
Tables1–3 and Equations1–2; Equations3–6 on pp8,11
Checked against complete supplied20-page article and relevant visual tables; model-audit.json records independent arithmetic. Verified means source-faithful, not validation of the underlying experiment.
Evidence
Using Table1 coding and the full printed polynomial coefficients at Table3 settings gives UT DPPH approximately78.10 rather than the reported54.75, and US TFC approximately0.837 rather than1.29. UT TPC lack-of-fit p=.0126 is also significant at.05.
Locator and assessment
Tables1–3 and Equations1–2; Equations3–6 on pp8,11, pp3–5.
Reviewer calculation from reported data, not corrected raw measurement. Rounded coefficient uncertainty does not plausibly account for these large discrepancies; retain source and flag unresolved reporting.