Third independent secondary corroboration of an already Established Zettel and Ready Claim. Primary resolution text remains preferable for extended quotation or legal analysis.
The passage corrects a common heritage interpretation by quoting the resolution’s import-protection direction and contrasting it with later Senate language.
Kosar distinguishes the 1964 designation of bourbon as a distinctive U.S. product from the later “America’s Native Spirit” language and explains that the resolution’s operative purpose was to prevent imported whiskey from being labeled bourbon.
Printed p. 112 / PDF sheet 114
Printed p. 111 / PDF sheet 113
Whiskey in the USA — A Rough Century Concluded with a Boom
Visually checked against printed pp. 111–112 / PDF sheets 113–114 on 2026-08-25.
Paraphrase of visually verified evidence at printed pp. 111–112 / PDF sheets 113–114.
Evidence
Kosar distinguishes the 1964 designation of bourbon as a distinctive U.S. product from the later “America’s Native Spirit” language and explains that the resolution’s operative purpose was to prevent imported whiskey from being labeled bourbon.
Location and context
The passage quotes the resolution’s trade-protection direction and contrasts it with later heritage language.
Annotation
This is a third independent secondary corroboration of an Established Zettel and Ready Claim. The primary resolution remains preferable for extended quotation or legal analysis.