Proposed Academy application: record nose, palate and preference separately during a side-by-side water comparison. This does not establish a universal dilution effect, an optimal water quantity, chemical causation or replication across tasters.
Release-specific consumer tasting note for a no-age-statement Scotch bottled at40% ABV; the review is a subjective observation.
In the Glansa account, Risen describes added water as opening the nose while weakening the palate; his overall assessment explicitly contrasts those two responses.
307
307
Scapa — Glansa
Checked against sequentially read supplied PDF screens and rendered pages; screen locators differ from printed pagination. Canonical attachment/local copy hash matches. Verified means source fidelity only; complete-edition collation and browser rendering remain open.
Evidence
In the Glansa account, Risen describes added water as opening the nose while weakening the palate; his overall assessment explicitly contrasts those two responses.
Location and context
Supplied PDF screens307–307; Scapa — Glansa.
Release-specific consumer tasting note for a no-age-statement Scotch bottled at40% ABV; the review is a subjective observation.
Researcher assessment
Proposed Academy application: record nose, palate and preference separately during a side-by-side water comparison. This does not establish a universal dilution effect, an optimal water quantity, chemical causation or replication across tasters.
Provenance
No access · 
Verification is limited to faithful representation of this supplied copy. This record does not certify technical accuracy, current specifications or publication of an Academy lesson.