Content
Citation(s) & Footnote(s)
Book(s)No access › No access
Written reading complete. Original HTML is preserved in the Wikipedia package linked from the Source record. Remote images, remaining primary corroboration and page-presentation checks remain open. This is not a fully processed source.
Source argument
The narrative follows disputed origins, Seagram-era market positioning and the two-mashbill/five-yeast production framework.
Evidence map
LINK-211, revision 1373289540: full numbered extraction lines 1–76 reviewed, including written reference entries and any tables. These locators identify the reviewed snapshot, not the underlying cited publications.
Paul Jones 1888 and Rose-family origin claims need original evidence. Facility date 1910 differs from brand date. Difficult US availability is not absolute absence. 2019 proof-gallon capacity is not physical liquid volume or realized output. Ten possible recipes does not mean every product contains all ten. Reference 20, DOI 10.1037/e670562012-001, is an unrelated psychology-awards entry and cannot support the whiskey award.
No unverified direct quotations promoted. Detailed local critical checkpoint retained alongside the numbered reading file.
Researcher synthesis
The recipe framework is a useful blending-retrieval connection, bounded by actual bottling composition. Quarantine the mismatched citation and check award organizers.
Assessment
Tertiary discovery evidence only. Preserve contradictory and time-dependent claims as open checks, not resolved facts. Images, native preservation and presentation pending. Source-reading completeness does not prove factual accuracy; no History/profile/trial changes.
