Attribution and locators
Kelly McHugh, “Commodity Chain Analysis, Global,” in Scott C. Martin, ed., The SAGE Encyclopedia of Alcohol (2015), PDF 864–868. PDF 866 and the signature at PDF 868 visually checked. These are physical PDF positions.
No access
Author’s framework
The entry describes a method for tracing inputs through processing and sale while asking how power and economic benefits are distributed. PDF 865–866 separates production nodes and discusses trade, national regulation, local labor markets and changing node locations. PDF 867–868 discusses marketing and industry concentration using older statistics.
Researcher synthesis
For whiskey, draw the material route separately from ownership and marketing control. A brand can span multiple facilities and firms; a map can reveal the questions that a single place-name conceals. Mapping roles does not itself prove their distribution is unequal, nor does it establish sensory quality.
Academy application
Original paper exercise: Farm A supplies grain to Distiller B; Warehouse C matures the spirit; Company D blends, bottles and markets it; Distributor E sells it to retailers. Ask who performs each stage, who owns the stock, who controls specifications and which answers remain unknown. The scenario supplies roles, not a real product claim. Add dates and documentary sources before applying it to a bottle.
Evidence boundary
Do not carry the entry’s 2001–2006 market numbers or present-tense 2015 statements into a current business forecast. The works in Further Readings have not been independently consulted in this pass. The theoretical framework is a perspective to use explicitly, not a universal account of every chain.
Existing connection
Production provenance is stage-specific when work crosses facilities supplies whiskey-specific stage provenance. This entry broadens the economic questions without replacing that evidence.