Ten trained assessors repeatedly mapped eight brandies on rectangular, square and circular sheets. Overall configurations were similar; some performance measures favored the circular format in this setting.
Source And Coverage
No access
Leanie Louw et al. (2015) — DOI
5-page short communication; design and conclusions selectively reviewed.
Review completed October 24, 2026 using whole-file searchable extraction and targeted reading. “Complete” describes this scoped note, not an exhaustive audit. Page locators refer to the supplied PDF unless printed pages are specified.
Findings And Method
Ten trained assessors repeatedly mapped eight brandies on rectangular, square and circular sheets. Overall configurations were similar; some performance measures favored the circular format in this setting.
Evidence Boundaries
Shape and available area were not fully isolated, the panel was small and specialized, and visible color could contribute to sorting. The study did not establish a general rule that a particular geometry reveals subtle versus large differences. An abstract comparison contains a repeated shape label.
Blending Lab Application — Researcher Synthesis
For any optional digital map, keep canvas geometry and scale consistent within comparisons and record device/layout. Do not mandate circles as scientifically superior. Retain the raw arrangement and repeat-task context.
The practical recommendation is distinct from the authors' tested result. Established chemistry and measurement definitions can be taught directly; a particular whiskey's response, a consumer segment or a profitable offer still requires appropriate evidence.
Connected Research
- No access — compare method, population and outcome before combining evidence.
- No access — compare method, population and outcome before combining evidence.
- No access — compare method, population and outcome before combining evidence.
Academy Use
The Short Version can teach the practical comparison; the Full Story should explain the mechanism, source method and limits. Use this note with No access and No access.
Pricing and membership remain proposals to test; this source does not validate a commercial offer.
Linked Analyses And Batch Register
Choosing among QDA, Napping, and GC-MS for whisky development — Daute et al.- Comparison of Consumer-Based Methodologies for Sensory Characterization: Case Study with Four Sample Sets of Powdered Drinks — Evidence and Blending Lab Applications
- Quick Insights into Whisky—Investigating Rapid and Efficient Methods for Sensory Evaluation and Chemical Analysis — Full-Source Literature Note
No access