Alcohol prohibition becomes effective only when statutes, local officers, prosecutors, courts, juries, political leadership, property rules, and distribution controls align closely enough to convert law into routine enforcement.
Alignment can increase enforcement capacity without establishing fairness, legitimacy, or equal application.
Tennessee's open saloons, locker clubs, jury resistance, municipal machines, federal-state boundary, and successive statutory escalations show why legislation alone did not produce compliance.
Created from the complete 457-sheet textual and visual review of Hannush. Source-level synthesis is verified; maturity remains Developing until independent corroboration broadens the evidence base. 2026-09-11: Law–Libecap working paper, all 45 pages reviewed, adds comparative evidence on food-law enforcement institutions (PDF32–38), not a direct test of prohibition. Its observational voting models do not prove causal necessity. Maturity remains Developing. 2026-09-11: Roberts (64 PDF pages) adds Wyoming enforcement/repeal evidence; Ehrlander (41 pages) adds Alaska/northern Canada comparison. Both fully read. Institutional alignment is a synthesis, not proven universal necessity; preserve racial discrimination, Indigenous agency, acquittals and primary-source limitations.
A Zettel is one durable idea in your own words—not a quotation, source summary, or draft-book claim.
Atomic idea
State one complete idea. It should be understandable on its own and specific enough to connect to other notes.
Reasoning
Explain why the idea is true or useful in Rationale and Implications. Record meaningful objections or exceptions in Counterpoints.
Provenance
Connect one or more Literature Notes. Direct source relations are legacy-only; trace evidence through the literature-note and excerpt chain.
Connections
Apply approved Tags for retrieval and one or more Themes only when the note genuinely advances those interpretive threads.
Maturity checklist
Hannush Source Audit — 28 September 2026
The Hannush enforcement passage crosses missing ebook309 between physical PDF329–330. Its evidence/citation pair is Needs Review; other sources retain their separate support.
The supplied capture lacks endnotes, bibliography and index, and has confirmed interior gaps. All available457 sheets were read; this is not full-source completion. Fresh source review and limitations