Recreating a flavor target does not require recreating its original recipe.
This is an attributed historical case; similarity judgments are not proof of chemical identity or blinded sensory equivalence.
Peat describes Paterson iterating with available mature malts, assigning floral contributions and other roles while pursuing the recovered whisky’s profile. The account describes 25 component whiskies, rather than direct reproduction of the original inputs.
Reviewed against PDF200–201/204/207 after all285pages. Proposed use: coded component trials toward a declared sensory target, with provenance recorded separately. Preserve attributed resemblance rather than claiming identity.
Idea
Recreating a flavor target does not require recreating its original recipe.
Case
Peat describes Paterson iterating with available mature malts, assigning floral contributions and other roles while pursuing the recovered whisky’s profile. The account describes 25 component whiskies, rather than direct reproduction of the original inputs.
Qualification
This is an attributed historical case; similarity judgments are not proof of chemical identity or blinded sensory equivalence.
Connections
Peat — Recreating a flavor target does not require recreating its original recipe
Shackleton’s Whisky — Target-led blending and the limits of replication