Supports the mediating-role correction without denying later coercive resolutions.
The passage distinguishes moderate organization from a parallel violent track.
The 1791 and 1792 anti-excise meetings were initially peaceful and constitutionally framed, and local leaders used representative assemblies to channel anger and discourage violence; federal reporting increasingly collapsed meeting, nonpayment, boycott, and force into one combination.
122
119
Chapter 7
Paraphrase checked against searchable text and rendered PDF sheets 119–122 on 2026-08-27.
No access › Whiskey Excerpts Database (USWA)
Paraphrase from Slaughter; checked against the supplied source, not independent corroboration of the historical claim.
Evidence
The 1791 and 1792 anti-excise meetings were initially peaceful and constitutionally framed, and local leaders used representative assemblies to channel anger and discourage violence; federal reporting increasingly collapsed meeting, nonpayment, boycott, and force into one combination.
Location and context
Source: No access
Start: 119
End: 122
Section: Chapter 7
The passage distinguishes moderate organization from a parallel violent track.
Annotation
Supports the mediating-role correction without denying later coercive resolutions.
Knowledge connections
Literature note: Excise resistance, frontier authority, and federal response — Slaughter
Citation: Slaughter1986Rebellion — PDF sheets 119–122
Supported claims: Anti-excise assemblies initially distinguished petition from violence
Verification checklist
Verification status: Verified.
Paraphrase checked against searchable text and rendered PDF sheets 119–122 on 2026-08-27.