![[SRC-126] Component identity and barrel-entry context](https://images.spr.so/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/j42No7y-dcokJuNgXeA0ig/f9faaa5a-12e7-445b-ab82-4c95c0f0f700/attachment-4c9836e8-5dbd-420f-8f7b-ee710b211b04-us_whiskey_academy/w=1920,quality=90,fit=scale-down)
Company examples are not universal Canadian practice. Figure 7 includes a base of 100 plus additions, so its columns are not normalized percentage totals. The stated 9.09 percent explanation is historical regulatory interpretation, not an American blending permission.
September 8 complete supplied-PDF re-review. Source assertions and researcher checks are distinguished.
Separate grain streams and different distillation and maturation treatments create distinguishable blending components; the review illustrates changing formulations and entry strengths.
PDF 6; printed 53
PDF 5; printed 52
Figures 7–8
Located text and displayed page/figure checked in the supplied nine-page PDF. Verified means faithful source representation, not independent validation of every author assertion.
No access / 
Evidence
Separate grain streams and different distillation and maturation treatments create distinguishable blending components; the review illustrates changing formulations and entry strengths.
Location and context
PDF 5–6; printed 52–53. Figures 7–8.
Annotation
Company examples are not universal Canadian practice. Figure 7 includes a base of 100 plus additions, so its columns are not normalized percentage totals. The stated 9.09 percent explanation is historical regulatory interpretation, not an American blending permission.
Citation: