Anderson, Anna Catherine Borden. “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799.” MA thesis, College of William and Mary, 2002. https://doi.org/10.21220/s2-d6ce-k310.
The broader ledger identifies219 people/businesses plus53 ambiguous entries, including at least16 enslaved people among identified entries. Of84 account holders,57 interacted with the distillery. Table10 classifies those57 by payment:20cash-only,11grain-only,6cash/miscellaneous,6contract,5miscellaneous,3grain/cash,3no payment, and three one-person categories.
Anderson, “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799,” 88–90 (PDF 96–98).
Anna Catherine Borden Anderson, “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799” (MA thesis, College of William and Mary, 2002), 88–90 (PDF 96–98), https://doi.org/10.21220/s2-d6ce-k310.
88–90
Anderson, “Study of Transition,” 88–90.
Printed 88–90; PDF 96–98
Thesis year, author and page locators checked; Ready means reference usable, not contested facts independently corroborated. Percentages describe account holders, not sales revenue or volume. Receipt of147gal by six contract recipients is not proof of their personal consumption.
No access / Whiskey Citations & Footnotes Database (USWA)
Source-bounded thesis analysis. Reference readiness is not independent corroboration.
Reference
Anna Catherine Borden Anderson, “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799” (MA thesis, College of William and Mary, 2002), 88–90 (PDF 96–98), https://doi.org/10.21220/s2-d6ce-k310.
Locator and connections
Printed 88–90; PDF 96–98. Source No access. Literature Note A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799 — full supplied-thesis analysis. Evidence
Anderson2002 — Customer population and payment methods.
Interpretation limits
Percentages describe account holders, not sales revenue or volume. Receipt of147gal by six contract recipients is not proof of their personal consumption.