Citation | Legacy Used Checkbox | Citation Summary | Citation Category | Permalink |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Retronasal aroma is defined as volatile chemicals reaching the olfactory epithelium from the mouth, while flavor is the combined sensation of taste and aroma and often mouthfeel. | Citation | |||
Odorants can reach the nose by two routes: orthonasal access during inhalation and retronasal access from the mouth during eating or drinking. | Citation | |||
Separate grain streams and different distillation and maturation treatments create distinguishable blending components; the review illustrates changing formulations and entry strengths. | Citation | |||
Figure 9 prints a 10,000-liter, 40-percent-ABV target and a bourbon component at 1 percent of alcohol, 48.2 percent ABV and 114.1 liters; these inputs are inconsistent. | Citation | |||
Historical Canadian recipes used named component volumes and color adjustment, showing blending as an explicit formulation practice rather than an undefined mixing step. | Citation | |||
The archival formulas use Imperial proof notation, differing units and ingredients including syrup, tea, rum and Scotch. | Citation | |||
Canadian blending recipes evolved toward percentage-based formulations, and component choices changed with regulation, philosophy, and ingredient availability. | Citation | |||
Livermore combines historical mash bills, distilling apparatus and commercial context to explain Canadian component production. | Citation | |||
The bibliography combines company archives, historical reports, government tables and regulations, books and the author's flavor-wheel and training material. | Citation | |||
The review distinguishes mathematical assembly from choosing components for a purpose, integrating flavor knowledge, costs, inventory, equipment, defect awareness and transfer of practitioner expertise. | Citation | |||
Untargeted FT-ICR mass spectrometry assigned thousands of molecular formulae per sample across 85 Scotch whiskies and revealed extensive chemical complexity. | Citation | |||
Van Krevelen and double-bond-equivalent plots showed substantial chemical diversity among samples and patterns associated with cask and age comparisons. | Citation | |||
The simulations found guaiacol associated with ethanol and preferentially located near the liquid-air interface at lower ethanol concentrations, with more bulk localization at higher concentrations. | Citation | |||
At about 45 percent ethanol or lower, modeled guaiacol favored the interface; at 59 percent it shifted toward the bulk, leading the authors to hypothesize that dilution could increase interface availability and evaporation probability. | Citation | |||
The chapter develops theory-based mathematical methods for dynamic Gestalt perception and reviews visual and configural processing rather than flavor, smell, taste, beverage, or whiskey. | Citation | |||
Everyday flavor reflects an interplay of taste, smell, touch, sight, and expectation, even though most people lack vocabulary for describing that integration. | Citation | |||
The book emphasizes that much of what people casually call taste is produced by smell, using nose-blocking comparisons to illustrate the distinction. | Citation | |||
The author cautions that prolonged oleo-saccharum extraction can permit unwanted fermentation or mold. | Citation | |||
The author presents room-temperature citrus-peel extraction as an option for avoiding heat-related aroma changes. | Citation | |||
A comparative table and discussion show that sensory methods trade detail, training, time, cost, and consumer relevance rather than offering one universally superior procedure. | Citation | |||
The review distinguishes discrimination, descriptive, and affective sensory methods and links method selection to the evaluation question. | Citation | |||
The book separates the tongue's basic tastes from characteristic food flavors that arise largely through volatile odorants reaching the nose. | Citation | |||
Odorants differ enormously in detection and recognition thresholds, so concentration rank alone cannot determine which compounds matter to perception. | Citation | |||
A twelve-week in-bottle bourbon study compared non-infused, wine-infused, and coffee-infused toasted American-oak spires using chemical and sensory measurements. | Citation | |||
The authors describe oak extraction as an initial rapid release, a stabilization phase, and a later slower phase, with treatment-dependent chemical trajectories. | Citation | |||
Diacetyl is presented as potentially pleasant at small amounts and a flavor defect at higher amounts, illustrating dose-dependent fault classification. | Citation | |||
The deck recommends retronasal tasting with positive and off-note references, panel proficiency checks, and embedded sensory best practices. | Citation | |||
The author argues that recognizing error requires experiments in which relevant parameters are controlled, because that is how competing explanations are separated. | Citation | |||
The book criticizes culinary rules supported by insufficient experimental evidence and separates scientific testing from inherited technique. | Citation | |||
The review describes wine and whisky blending as combining components to deliver a consistent target profile across time, likened to perceptually equivalent outputs from different inputs. | Citation | |||
A small blindfolded tasting study described in the review found participants unable to identify six named blended and single-malt whiskies better than chance. | Citation | |||
The book identifies odor molecules carried to the nose during exhalation as retronasal smell and treats that route as central to wine flavor. | Citation | |||
The book decomposes tasting into ordered actions in which oral processing and exhalation carry aroma to the nose, adding retronasal smell to the total flavor experience. | Citation | |||
After describing smell images and retronasal processing, the book brings taste, touch, vision, hearing, muscles, and movement into the total flavor system. | Citation | |||
The book distinguishes retronasal smell from orthonasal sniffing and argues that smell delivered from the mouth is a dominant contributor to flavor. | Citation | |||
The study reports that rapid sensory and semi-automated GC-MS data could classify its sixteen Scotch and American whisky samples with high in-sample accuracy while presenting the work as a step toward a broader platform. | Citation | |||
The study used a trained panel, reference-based attribute selection, rate-all-that-apply evaluation, and standardized proof levels for orthonasal whisky assessment. | Citation | |||
The kit assigns distinct roles to oak, vanillin, peat, astringent, and ester concentrates in constructing whiskey-like profiles. | Citation | |||
The booklet supplies measured amounts of base profiles, oak, vanillin, astringent notes, caramel, and glycerine for a bourbon-style mixture. | Citation | |||
Walker describes innovation as requiring balance between distillery character and wood influence and compares building a whisky to building a mixed serve from flavor, texture, and finish elements. | Citation | |||
Walker describes starting from intended drinker, occasion, flavor, and texture, then choosing distilleries and cask styles to build the target. | Citation | |||
The article explains a two- or three-tier wheel that moves from broad classes such as fruity to increasingly specific descriptors. | Citation | |||
The proposed wheel is intended to help American craft distillers assess positive aromas and off-notes from raw materials through maturation while acknowledging the difficulty of standardizing aromas objectively. | Citation | |||
The blender must anticipate future stock needs and sometimes substitute or reconstruct unavailable component character with combinations of other whiskies. | Citation | |||
Swan describes adding component whiskies around a core, evaluating integration, and changing the formulation or adding components when the first attempt remains imbalanced. | Citation | |||
The book states that odorants and tastants interact and that molecules below individual perception thresholds can influence the overall perceived wine. | Citation | |||
The book describes conscious flavor as brain-processed information shaped by context, experience, expectation, expertise, and individual olfactory-receptor differences. | Citation | |||
The study narrows multivariate and correlation results to fourteen proposed markers and links them to category and sensory differences across the tested samples. | Citation | |||
The study used ten evaluators, eleven commercial samples across five spirit categories, agreed descriptors, coded glasses, standardized room conditions, triplicate evaluations, and a ten-point intensity scale. | Citation | |||
Publication-ready Chicago note and bibliography citation for the complete online work; individual claims should use the related locator-level Excerpts. | Citation | |||