Anderson, Anna Catherine Borden. “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799.” MA thesis, College of William and Mary, 2002. https://doi.org/10.21220/s2-d6ce-k310.
Anderson first tests closed/open economic models drawn from twentieth-century anthropological studies, then concludes that the binary is inadequate for Mount Vernon. Diversification among planter-businessmen is the more nuanced concluding frame.
Anderson, “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799,” 6–19, 98–101 (PDF 14–27, 106–109).
Anna Catherine Borden Anderson, “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799” (MA thesis, College of William and Mary, 2002), 6–19, 98–101 (PDF 14–27, 106–109), https://doi.org/10.21220/s2-d6ce-k310.
6–19, 98–101
Anderson, “Study of Transition,” 6–19, 98–101.
Printed 6–19, 98–101; PDF 14–27, 106–109
Thesis year, author and page locators checked; Ready means reference usable, not contested facts independently corroborated. Do not quote the initial hypothesis as the final conclusion; commercialization does not establish social equality.
No access / Whiskey Citations & Footnotes Database (USWA)
Source-bounded thesis analysis. Reference readiness is not independent corroboration.
Reference
Anna Catherine Borden Anderson, “A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799” (MA thesis, College of William and Mary, 2002), 6–19, 98–101 (PDF 14–27, 106–109), https://doi.org/10.21220/s2-d6ce-k310.
Locator and connections
Printed 6–19, 98–101; PDF 14–27, 106–109. Source No access. Literature Note A Study of Transition in Plantation Economy: George Washington’s Whiskey Distillery, 1799 — full supplied-thesis analysis. Evidence
Anderson2002 — Economic model and its rejection.
Interpretation limits
Do not quote the initial hypothesis as the final conclusion; commercialization does not establish social equality.