Broom, Dave. Gin: The Manual. 2017 edition. London: Mitchell Beazley, 2017. First published 2015. ISBN9781784723576.
Do not classify all these drinks as whiskey or infer present legal category rules from the2017 text. PDF183 is1999, not the OCR's1993. Reconstructed historic products are not independent proof of historic practice.
Dave Broom, Gin: The Manual, 2017 ed. (London: Mitchell Beazley, 2017), supplied PDF pp. 174–185 (printed pp. 170–181).
Dave Broom, Gin: The Manual, 2017 ed. (London: Mitchell Beazley, 2017), supplied PDF pp. 174–185 (printed pp. 170–181).
185
174
Broom, Gin: The Manual, PDF 174–185.
PDF pagination — Genever, grain spirits and whiskey bridges
Visible title/author/edition and back-cover ISBN checked. PDF8 copyright strip obscures part of text; cited passages are readable and reviewed. PDF pagination kept distinct from printed numbering. Source, locator, relation, body and display checks complete. Ready for qualified attribution only, not independent factual verification.
No access / Whiskey Citations & Footnotes Database (USWA)
Attribution reference; source, locator, relations and page presentation checked. Ready for qualified attribution, not factual endorsement. The Source retains its copyright-page limitation.
Source and locator
No access, PDF 174–185 (printed 170–181); Genever, grain spirits and whiskey bridges. Evidence: Gin Manual — Genever, grain spirits and whiskey bridges.
Formatted outputs
Dave Broom, Gin: The Manual, 2017 ed. (London: Mitchell Beazley, 2017), supplied PDF pp. 174–185 (printed pp. 170–181).
Short form: Broom, Gin: The Manual, PDF 174–185.
Bibliography: Broom, Dave. Gin: The Manual. 2017 edition. London: Mitchell Beazley, 2017. First published 2015. ISBN9781784723576.
Usage map
Gin: The Manual (2017) — complete readable-content analysis. No public Claim, History page or manuscript placement created.
Do not classify all these drinks as whiskey or infer present legal category rules from the2017 text. PDF183 is1999, not the OCR's1993. Reconstructed historic products are not independent proof of historic practice.