Arnold, Robert J., Alejandra Ochoa, Chris R. Kerth, Rhonda K. Miller, and Seth C. Murray. “Assessing the Impact of Corn Variety and Texas Terroir on Flavor and Alcohol Yield in New-Make Bourbon Whiskey.” PLOS ONE 14, no. 8 (2019): e0220787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220787.
The sensory matrices contain batch-level consensus descriptors, not individual consumer ratings. S9 totals sum the selected aroma columns and partition them using S10 good/bad categories; all 90 stored sum formulas agree with independent arithmetic.
Arnold, Robert J., Alejandra Ochoa, Chris R. Kerth, Rhonda K. Miller, and Seth C. Murray. “Assessing the Impact of Corn Variety and Texas Terroir on Flavor and Alcohol Yield in New-Make Bourbon Whiskey.” PLOS ONE 14, no. 8 (2019): e0220787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220787.
S3 Sheet1 B2:BC32; S9 B2:BK32; S10 B2:C31
Arnold et al., “Corn Variety and Texas Terroir,” S3 Sheet1 B2:BC32; S9 B2:BK32; S10 B2:C31.
S3 Sheet1 B2:BC32; S9 B2:BK32; S10 B2:C31
Blended, Alcohol and trigeminal attributes are outside the total. Medicinal is classified good while woody and buttery are bad; these are study-specific new-make assumptions, not rules for the user's blend. The paper's favorable soapy wording conflicts with S10.
No access → No access
Source and locator
S3 Sheet1 B2:BC32; S9 B2:BK32; S10 B2:C31
Arnold, Robert J., Alejandra Ochoa, Chris R. Kerth, Rhonda K. Miller, and Seth C. Murray. “Assessing the Impact of Corn Variety and Texas Terroir on Flavor and Alcohol Yield in New-Make Bourbon Whiskey.” PLOS ONE 14, no. 8 (2019): e0220787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220787.
Supported use
The sensory matrices contain batch-level consensus descriptors, not individual consumer ratings. S9 totals sum the selected aroma columns and partition them using S10 good/bad categories; all 90 stored sum formulas agree with independent arithmetic.
Blended, Alcohol and trigeminal attributes are outside the total. Medicinal is classified good while woody and buttery are bad; these are study-specific new-make assumptions, not rules for the user's blend. The paper's favorable soapy wording conflicts with S10.
Needs Review for publication use; no History placement.