Blended, Alcohol and trigeminal attributes are outside the total. Medicinal is classified good while woody and buttery are bad; these are study-specific new-make assumptions, not rules for the user's blend. The paper's favorable soapy wording conflicts with S10.
The sensory matrices contain batch-level consensus descriptors, not individual consumer ratings. S9 totals sum the selected aroma columns and partition them using S10 good/bad categories; all 90 stored sum formulas agree with independent arithmetic.
S3 Sheet1 B2:BC32; S9 B2:BK32; S10 B2:C31
S3 Sheet1 B2:BC32; S9 B2:BK32; S10 B2:C31
Read source workbook structure and whole-column diagnostics; formula arithmetic independently checked. Not a full statistical replication. Original workbook bytes preserved unchanged.
No access → No access
Evidence
The sensory matrices contain batch-level consensus descriptors, not individual consumer ratings. S9 totals sum the selected aroma columns and partition them using S10 good/bad categories; all 90 stored sum formulas agree with independent arithmetic.
Location and qualification
S3 Sheet1 B2:BC32; S9 B2:BK32; S10 B2:C31
Blended, Alcohol and trigeminal attributes are outside the total. Medicinal is classified good while woody and buttery are bad; these are study-specific new-make assumptions, not rules for the user's blend. The paper's favorable soapy wording conflicts with S10.
Paraphrase; original workbooks preserved unchanged. Whole-column checks and formula arithmetic are not independent experimental replication.