Jackson, Nick. Beyond Flavour: Wine Tasting by Structure. 2nd ed. Copyright 2022. Publisher not stated in supplied copy.
The appendix separates questions about identity, origin, quality, vintage and style. Style asks what the wine is trying to be; simple immediate pleasure and ambitious aging are different valid purposes. Jackson advises judging success within the chosen style rather than personal prejudice.
Nick Jackson, Beyond Flavour: Wine Tasting by Structure, 2nd ed. (copyright 2022; publisher unstated), supplied PDF positions 201–203.
Nick Jackson, Beyond Flavour: Wine Tasting by Structure, 2nd ed. (copyright 2022; publisher unstated), supplied PDF positions 201–203.
203
201
Jackson, Beyond Flavour, PDF 201–203.
Exam questions and style-relative success
Ready means recoverable source and precise supplied-PDF locator; not publication approval or authenticated direct quotation. Limits: Exam rewards are not current certification policy verified here. Warm-vintage and acid-versus-fruit finish guesses are not proof. This passage qualifies simplistic intensity/ageability hierarchies elsewhere and supports keeping target fit separate from descriptive scores.
No access / Whiskey Citations & Footnotes Database (USWA)
Citation
Nick Jackson, Beyond Flavour: Wine Tasting by Structure, 2nd ed. (copyright 2022; publisher unstated), supplied PDF positions 201–203.
Bibliography
Jackson, Nick. Beyond Flavour: Wine Tasting by Structure. 2nd ed. Copyright 2022. Publisher not stated in supplied copy.
Supported passage
The appendix separates questions about identity, origin, quality, vintage and style. Style asks what the wine is trying to be; simple immediate pleasure and ambitious aging are different valid purposes. Jackson advises judging success within the chosen style rather than personal prejudice.
Verification boundary
The native source and exact PDF positions are recoverable. This record cites a paraphrase; no direct quotation is authenticated. Publisher and ISBN remain unstated.
Exam rewards are not current certification policy verified here. Warm-vintage and acid-versus-fruit finish guesses are not proof. This passage qualifies simplistic intensity/ageability hierarchies elsewhere and supports keeping target fit separate from descriptive scores.