A verified source Excerpt and Ready Chicago Notes and Bibliography citation are linked.
The scientific literature reviewed by Miller does not establish a unique 'marriage in wood' mechanism, although ordinary equilibration and continuing extraction or reaction after components are blended remain plausible.
Claim wording, qualification, printed locator, PDF-sheet mapping, and rendered pages were checked during the complete 533-sheet review.
Absence of demonstrated evidence in this synthesis is not proof that no sensory difference can occur under any finishing regimen.
The romantic production claim should be separated from physically plausible redistribution and continued maturation.
Supported by one locator-verified secondary synthesis. Preserve the stated qualifications and seek independent corroboration before using a source-specific quantitative result as a universal rule.
Claim record created from a complete source review.
Claim
The scientific literature reviewed by Miller does not establish a unique 'marriage in wood' mechanism, although ordinary equilibration and continuing extraction or reaction after components are blended remain plausible.
Reasoning
The romantic production claim should be separated from physically plausible redistribution and continued maturation.
Qualification
Absence of demonstrated evidence in this synthesis is not proof that no sensory difference can occur under any finishing regimen.