The jar story and a retained culture in 2003 do not prove an unchanged culture from 1795. Corporate strains and family mash traditions are separate claims. Preserve anecdotal status and dated role changes.
Post-Repeal production and family succession
Pacult dates the new post-Repeal yeast culture to 1934 and later recounts Jim's famous protection of a yeast jar. He also distinguishes the 1941 Blum buyout, retirements, Jim's death, Earl's move to Heaven Hill and Carl's production role.
PDF 116
PDF 108
Post-Repeal production and family succession
All cited supplied PDF screens reviewed in text and images. Faithful paraphrase checked; not independent validation of the source's assertions. PDF locators are physical screens, not printed or ebook-reader pages. No quotations reproduced.
No access / Whiskey Excerpts Database (USWA) / No access
Faithful source paraphrase, not an independently verified historical or technical conclusion.
Evidence
Pacult dates the new post-Repeal yeast culture to 1934 and later recounts Jim's famous protection of a yeast jar. He also distinguishes the 1941 Blum buyout, retirements, Jim's death, Earl's move to Heaven Hill and Carl's production role.
Location and context
Supplied PDF screens 108–116; Post-Repeal production and family succession. Screen locators are not printed-page numbers.
No access • 
Annotation
The jar story and a retained culture in 2003 do not prove an unchanged culture from 1795. Corporate strains and family mash traditions are separate claims. Preserve anecdotal status and dated role changes.