The authors compare a federal prohibition indicator with real enforcement expenditure and vary tax controls, including interactions. The 1917–1919 indicator does not separately identify influenza, wartime restrictions, immigration or stockpiling effects. Such explanations remain hypotheses.
20
16
PDF18–22; Tables8–9/PDF36–37
Full44-page source and figures/tables read; paraphrase checked with inferential limits. No independent model replication.
No access
Evidence
Paraphrase, not a direct quotation.
The authors compare a federal prohibition indicator with real enforcement expenditure and vary tax controls, including interactions. The 1917–1919 indicator does not separately identify influenza, wartime restrictions, immigration or stockpiling effects. Such explanations remain hypotheses.
Location and context
Printed pp.16–20; PDF18–22; Tables8–9/PDF36–37. PDF pagination includes two preliminary pages.
Annotation
Historical-source analysis, not current health or legal advice. Verified here means faithful to this source, not independent validation of its causal conclusions.
Verification checklist
Dills–Miron 2003 — Federal estimates depend on controls and model design