Connects abstract federal enforcement to the burdensome long-distance legal process that sharpened local conflict.
The summonses followed a decision to prosecute excise resistance more vigorously. Service of the processes immediately preceded the July confrontation involving Marshal David Lenox and excise supervisor John Neville.
District Attorney William Rawle secured processes from the federal court in Philadelphia ordering the appearance of over sixty western country distillers before the court during August.
PDF p. 184; printed p. 177
PDF p. 184; printed p. 177
Chapter 11 — Rebellion
Visually checked against rendered PDF p. 184 / printed p. 177 on 2026-08-24.
No access › Whiskey Excerpts Database (USWA)
Direct Quote from Slaughter; checked against the supplied source, not independent corroboration of the historical claim.
Evidence
District Attorney William Rawle secured processes from the federal court in Philadelphia ordering the appearance of over sixty western country distillers before the court during August.
Location and context
Source: No access
Start: PDF p. 184; printed p. 177
End: PDF p. 184; printed p. 177
Section: Chapter 11 — Rebellion
The summonses followed a decision to prosecute excise resistance more vigorously. Service of the processes immediately preceded the July confrontation involving Marshal David Lenox and excise supervisor John Neville.
Annotation
Connects abstract federal enforcement to the burdensome long-distance legal process that sharpened local conflict.
Knowledge connections
Literature note: Excise resistance, frontier authority, and federal response — Slaughter
Citation: Slaughter — The Whiskey Rebellion — p. 177
Supported claims: The Whiskey Rebellion joined excise resistance to wider conflicts over authority
Verification checklist
Verification status: Verified.
Visually checked against rendered PDF p. 184 / printed p. 177 on 2026-08-24.