Connect business succession, transferable goodwill and surname branding. Keep nineteenth-century legal holding distinct from later prohibition-era biography and present trademark ownership.
The entire written source was reviewed. Comments, when present, are distinguished from the authored article.
Cites Frazier v. Dowling,18 Ky.L.Rptr.1109,39 S.W.45(Ky.1897). Traces 1870 partnership,1882 sale,1885 return and later Dowling ownership; describes injunction upheld against the competing Waterfill/Frazier business. Links the precedent to later Samuels litigation and Mary Dowling’s Mexican enterprise.
Final two paragraphs
Paragraph beginning As explained in Frazier v. Dowling
Paragraph beginning As explained in Frazier v. Dowling; Paragraph beginning The Waterfill family; Paragraph beginning When the Dowlings learned; Final two paragraphs
Source-faithful paraphrase only; not independent corroboration. Court opinion not yet independently read in this intake. First-cases claim, Mary’s bootlegging appeal rationale, Mexican production and present Heaven Hill ownership require separate verification. Author’s proposed motive for the son is speculation, not a finding.
No access / Whiskey Excerpts Database (USWA)
Source-faithful paraphrase. Verified does not mean independently corroborated.
Evidence
Cites Frazier v. Dowling,18 Ky.L.Rptr.1109,39 S.W.45(Ky.1897). Traces 1870 partnership,1882 sale,1885 return and later Dowling ownership; describes injunction upheld against the competing Waterfill/Frazier business. Links the precedent to later Samuels litigation and Mary Dowling’s Mexican enterprise.
Location and context
No access. Paragraph beginning As explained in Frazier v. Dowling; Paragraph beginning The Waterfill family; Paragraph beginning When the Dowlings learned; Final two paragraphs.
Full written article reviewed through its ending.
Annotation
Connect business succession, transferable goodwill and surname branding. Keep nineteenth-century legal holding distinct from later prohibition-era biography and present trademark ownership.
Court opinion not yet independently read in this intake. First-cases claim, Mary’s bootlegging appeal rationale, Mexican production and present Heaven Hill ownership require separate verification. Author’s proposed motive for the son is speculation, not a finding.