Central evidence against one-compound/one-note blending rules.
Evidence captured during full-source processing of the supplied PDF.
Some omissions produced significant differences and others did not, including high-OAV damascenone. The authors suggest masking within the mixture; this experiment does not isolate that mechanism, and a nonsignificant omission does not establish zero contribution.
6
6
Omission experiments and summary
Independently rechecked September 27, 2026 against complete source and Tables 4–6; matrix exception and inferential limits made explicit.
Whiskey Knowledge Databases › Evidence Excerpts
Verified Paraphrase checked against the complete supplied source.
Evidence
Some omissions produced significant differences and others did not, including high-OAV damascenone. The authors suggest masking within the mixture; this experiment does not isolate that mechanism, and a nonsignificant omission does not establish zero contribution.
Locator and context
Locator: Page 6–6
Source section: Omission experiments and summary
Context: Evidence captured during full-source processing of the supplied PDF.
Interpretation and caution
Central evidence against one-compound/one-note blending rules.
Verification
Paraphrase checked against local PDF sheet 6 on 2026-09-05; not presented as a verbatim quotation.