Stock, medicinal permissions, industrial alcohol and corporate consolidation connect local whiskey history. Preserve source date, named attribution and contrary evidence; no current-state inference.
The entire written source was reviewed. Comments, when present, are distinguished from the authored article.
Reports Overholt resale, fragrance business, 1938 acquisitions, Roy/Otis/Charlie Beam roles and post-1954 closure/reuse; three comments read.
Three comments
Schulte and Overholt
Schulte and Overholt; Fragrances and post-Repeal acquisitions; Beam family; Schenley and site reuse; Three comments
Source-faithful paraphrase only; not independent corroboration. Industrial-alcohol diversion is presented as alleged; company culpability not established. Monetary values, dates and brand authorship need corroboration. Part4 reviewed, not parts1–3. Perfume image unreviewed.
No access / Whiskey Excerpts Database (USWA)
Source-faithful paraphrase. Verified does not mean independently corroborated.
Evidence
Reports Overholt resale, fragrance business, 1938 acquisitions, Roy/Otis/Charlie Beam roles and post-1954 closure/reuse; three comments read.
Location and context
No access. Schulte and Overholt; Fragrances and post-Repeal acquisitions; Beam family; Schenley and site reuse; Three comments.
Full written article reviewed; embedded evidence remains pending.
Annotation
Stock, medicinal permissions, industrial alcohol and corporate consolidation connect local whiskey history. Preserve source date, named attribution and contrary evidence; no current-state inference.
Industrial-alcohol diversion is presented as alleged; company culpability not established. Monetary values, dates and brand authorship need corroboration. Part4 reviewed, not parts1–3. Perfume image unreviewed.