SPME Arrow with GC×GC-MS expands detectable volatile coverage in three whisky types under the tested preparation. The authors report 167 tentative identifications versus 126 for conventional SPME and analyte-dependent sensitivity and repeatability improvements.
Source And Coverage
No access
Antonio Ferracane et al. (2022) — DOI
PDF sheets 1–6 and selected later discussion; selected identification table, not every compound row audited.
Review completed October 24, 2026 using whole-file searchable extraction and targeted reading. “Complete” describes this scoped note, not an exhaustive audit. Page locators refer to the supplied PDF unless printed pages are specified.
Findings And Method
SPME Arrow with GC×GC-MS expands detectable volatile coverage in three whisky types under the tested preparation. The authors report 167 tentative identifications versus 126 for conventional SPME and analyte-dependent sensitivity and repeatability improvements.
Evidence Boundaries
The supplied filename incorrectly attributes this PDF to MacNamara, Leardi and Warren (2011). The actual paper is Ferracane et al. (2022), Journal of Chromatography A 1676, 463241. Fiber materials/dimensions and selected optimization markers limit a format-only comparison. Library match and retention-index agreement are tentative identification, not reference-standard confirmation. No panel or omission experiment validates a flavor prediction.
Blending Lab Application — Researcher Synthesis
Catalog the actual paper and retain the original filename as provenance. Store identity confidence and method metadata; never equate more peaks with better flavor or use analytical radar charts as sensory ratings.
The practical recommendation is distinct from the authors' tested result. Established chemistry and measurement definitions can be taught directly; a particular whiskey's response, a consumer segment or a profitable offer still requires appropriate evidence.
Connected Research
- No access — compare method, population and outcome before combining evidence.
- No access — compare method, population and outcome before combining evidence.
- No access — compare method, population and outcome before combining evidence.
- No access — compare method, population and outcome before combining evidence.
Academy Use
The Short Version can teach the practical comparison; the Full Story should explain the mechanism, source method and limits. Use this note with No access and No access.
Pricing and membership remain proposals to test; this source does not validate a commercial offer.
Linked Analyses And Batch Register
Comparative Study of the Whisky Aroma Profile Based on Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction Using Different Fibre Coatings — Evidence and Blending Lab Applications- Comparison of Two Extraction Methods for Evaluation of Volatile Constituents Patterns in Commercial Whiskeys: Elucidation of the Main Odour-Active Compounds — Evidence and Blending Lab Applications
- Model-mixture development for cross-spirit flavor analysis — Barnes et al.
- Quick Insights into Whisky—Investigating Rapid and Efficient Methods for Sensory Evaluation and Chemical Analysis — Full-Source Literature Note
No access