Neuroscience counts and training claims are introductory secondary claims. Blinding reduces certain cues, not all bias; learned metaphors are not literal ingredients or chemical assays.
Full-source second-edition wine/blind-tasting review; supplied PDF positions, not printed pagination.
The text distinguishes taste, mouthfeel, chemesthesis and ortho/retronasal smelling, and describes expectation, memory, adaptation and a learned descriptor vocabulary. It also warns that comparison can distort intensity judgments and analytical vocabulary can limit broader appreciation.
52
48
Sensory experience includes context, language and learning
Paraphrase checked against the supplied text and rendered page images. Verified means source fidelity, not independent validation of every claim or applicability to whiskey.
No access / Whiskey Excerpts Database (USWA)
Source-faithful paraphrase; not a direct quotation or independent scientific verification.
Source and locator
No access; supplied PDF positions 48–52. Sensory experience includes context, language and learning.
Paraphrase
The text distinguishes taste, mouthfeel, chemesthesis and ortho/retronasal smelling, and describes expectation, memory, adaptation and a learned descriptor vocabulary. It also warns that comparison can distort intensity judgments and analytical vocabulary can limit broader appreciation.
Context and limitations
Neuroscience counts and training claims are introductory secondary claims. Blinding reduces certain cues, not all bias; learned metaphors are not literal ingredients or chemical assays.
Connections
Literature note The Concise Guide to Wine and Blind Tasting — full-source analysis; recoverable citation
Burton 2016 · 12 · PDF 48–52.