Okolo et al. — Authentication methods and limits of inference

Source argument

Use the located evidence below; avoid treating this review as independent replication.

Evidence map

Researcher synthesis

For our library, separate an instrument's measured endpoint from a consumer decision. A classifier, composition assay and preference test are different kinds of evidence. Retain the primary-study path rather than converting this review into a universal blend-making rule.

Assessment

Researcher checks before quantitative reuse: Table 2 versus prose model labels; isotope units and radiocarbon terminology; possible overbroad age extrapolations; bibliography typos; Figure 1 taxonomy and clipped final label. Do not adopt toxicology thresholds, legal-standing assertions or home-authentication claims without an appropriate primary authority. This is a verification agenda, not a corrected edition of the article.

Connections

No access

Reconcile existing adulteration and elemental-profile records before adding duplicate primary sources. No new Zettel is warranted solely by broad statements in this secondary review.

Completion checklist

~~All main sections, six tables, figure and reference list reviewed.~~

~~Original privately preserved; commercial figure reuse not authorized by the recorded license.~~

~~Final evidence and credit readback complete.~~

Page presentation verified.

Sources

Okolo, Chioke A., Kieran N. Kilcawley, and Christine O'Connor. “Recent advances in whiskey analysis for authentication, discrimination, and quality control.” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 22, no. 6 (2023): 4957–4992. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13249.