Use Risen PDF p. 63 for whole-mash system compatibility, Owens, Dikty, and Faulkner PDF p. 61 for geometry and reflux, and Wright and Pilkington printed p. 101 / PDF sheet 291 for the American beer-column plus doubler system and its control limits.
Pot and column stills should be compared by system fit—feed composition, operating mode, desired separation, and target spirit—not by a simple craft-versus-industrial hierarchy.
Three independent passages were visually verified. Batch 028 supplies direct American-system corroboration and completes the evidence needed to establish ZET-9.
Both still families are configurable, and operator choices matter. This claim does not say that equipment type is irrelevant.
Risen explains why continuous columns suit whole-mash American whiskey production; Owens, Dikty, and Faulkner show how pot-still geometry and reflux alter separation; Wright and Pilkington add direct beer-column plus doubler evidence and identify bounded adjustment through trays, reflux, and cuts. Together they support comparison by system function rather than cultural prestige.
Batch 028 matures ZET-9 to Established. Claim remains Ready for Drafting / Strong / High / Verified / Ready. Fresh Proof source audit: full supplied text read, evidence locators rechecked. Reported copper intervention and cited experiment are different evidence types; the complete relocation difference remains unresolved. This source-specific audit does not independently reverify other linked works or increase claim confidence.