Logo
  • Home
  • Learn
  • Explore
  • Resources
  • About
Sipos et al. 2025 — pairwise sensory methods and limits
Sipos et al. 2025 — pairwise sensory methods and limits

Sipos et al. 2025 — pairwise sensory methods and limits

icon
Tags
Paired-Comparison TestingPaired-Comparison TestingSensory EvaluationSensory EvaluationSensory Method SelectionSensory Method SelectionHedonic Consumer TestingHedonic Consumer Testing
icon
Legacy Single Excerpt
icon
Legacy Associated Permanent Note
Content
Citation(s) & Footnote(s)
Book(s)
✅

Complete source processing. The accessible web page was read in full, metadata-checked, critically assessed, and converted into verified locator-level evidence on 2026-08-29.

Source

No access

Core summary

The review explains how pairwise tests can address intensity or preference, why question direction matters, and why forced-choice outcomes do not establish magnitude.

Author argument

Pairwise sensory methods are simple and useful, but their design, assessor selection, and statistical interpretation must match the research objective.

Evidence map

Strong, open-access, peer-reviewed synthesis with direct methodological discussion and stable page locators.

Critical assessment

A broad review rather than a whiskey-specific experiment; method principles are general to homogeneous food and beverage products.

Retrieval and synthesis

Use paired preference for consumer choice, separately test detectability or a named attribute when needed, randomize coded presentation, and avoid claiming that a winning sample is better by a measurable amount.

Publication-stage controls

Full accessible page read
Author or institutional creator normalized
Source assertions separated from researcher inference
Conflicts, commercial perspective, and factual defects recorded
Regulatory statements routed to primary law
Locator-level paraphrase evidence created
Chicago citation prepared
Retrieval tags applied
Drafting use and exclusions stated

Open questions

A future pilot protocol should predefine panel type, sample size, repetition, significance threshold, and the treatment of forced guesses.

Date
August 29, 2026
icon
Contributors
László SiposLászló SiposZsófia GalambosiZsófia GalambosiPéter BiróPéter BiróLászló CsatóLászló CsatóSándor BozókiSándor Bozóki
icon
Source
No access
icon
Excerpts
Sipos et al. — pairwise tests can target intensity or preferenceSipos et al. — pairwise tests can target intensity or preferenceSipos et al. — forced-choice pairwise results do not establish magnitudeSipos et al. — forced-choice pairwise results do not establish magnitude
icon
Zettels
Sensory questions require distinct test methodsSensory questions require distinct test methods
icon
Citations
László Sipos, Zsófia Galambosi, Péter Biró, László Csató, and Sándor Bozóki — Trends and Directions of Preference Elicitation and Assessment in Food Science: Single-, Pair-, and Multi-Criteria Ranking MethodsLászló Sipos, Zsófia Galambosi, Péter Biró, László Csató, and Sándor Bozóki — Trends and Directions of Preference Elicitation and Assessment in Food Science: Single-, Pair-, and Multi-Criteria Ranking Methods
Logo

Policies

Home

Learn

Whiskey History

From Grain to Glass

Evaluating Whiskey

The Blending Lab

Explore

Whiskey Directory

Distillery Profiles

Brand Profiles

Regional Profiles

People of American Whiskey

Resources

About

About the Academy

Contact the Academy

© 2026 US Whiskey Academy LLC. All rights reserved.