Detectability, attribute description, liking, and preference are different response questions and should not be treated as interchangeable outputs of one sensory test.
A carefully designed session may collect more than one response family, but each measure still needs its own instructions, analysis, and inference boundary.
A blend can be perceptibly different without being preferred, preferred without revealing which attribute changed, or descriptively distinctive without being broadly liked. Declaring the decision question before choosing the test prevents one response family from being overinterpreted as another.
Established synthesis strengthened on 2026-08-29 by accessible WSU method categories, AWRI paired-preference guidance, and the open-access peer-reviewed Sipos et al. review. Claim 186 and its citations are publication-ready.
A Zettel is one durable idea in your own words—not a quotation, source summary, or draft-book claim.
Atomic idea
State one complete idea. It should be understandable on its own and specific enough to connect to other notes.
Reasoning
Explain why the idea is true or useful in Rationale and Implications. Record meaningful objections or exceptions in Counterpoints.
Provenance
Connect one or more Literature Notes. Direct source relations are legacy-only; trace evidence through the literature-note and excerpt chain.
Connections
Apply approved Tags for retrieval and one or more Themes only when the note genuinely advances those interpretive threads.
Maturity checklist
Sensory Evaluation Techniques — Critical Extension
Meilgaard, Civille and Carr (2016), pp. 71–78 and chapters 7–13, organize test choice around the response and inference required. Intensity and just-about-right ratings do not measure liking. Proposed Academy use: require a decision question before selecting a tasting worksheet.
Meilgaard 2016 — Question, response and inference must match
Sensory Evaluation Techniques — Methods, Critical Corrections And Academy Applications