Useful boundary for terroir and blending research: elemental discrimination does not itself establish sensory differences or a successful blend recipe.
Observational chemical discrimination is not proof of causal grain or soil flavor effects. Sources of elements are hypotheses rather than controlled interventions.
The authors interpret several differentiating elements as likely contributions from processing equipment and dilution water. They qualify the strontium-water explanation as speculative and call for measurements across production steps. The study contains no sensory test or blending trial.
4
3.1
Results 3.1–3.2; Conclusions
Checked against the supplied PDF browser display (French Rum) or publisher HTML (Hopfer) on 2026-09-06. Verified means faithful representation of the source, not independent confirmation of the source's claim. Preservation holds remain on Source.
No access / Whiskey Excerpts Database (USWA)
Verified means this note faithfully represents the material reviewed. It does not mean the author's historical or causal claims have been independently established.
Evidence
The authors interpret several differentiating elements as likely contributions from processing equipment and dilution water. They qualify the strontium-water explanation as speculative and call for measurements across production steps. The study contains no sensory test or blending trial.
Evidence type: Paraphrase. This is not a verbatim quotation.
Location and context
Source: No access.
Publisher HTML: Results 3.1–3.2; Conclusions.
Observational chemical discrimination is not proof of causal grain or soil flavor effects. Sources of elements are hypotheses rather than controlled interventions.
Annotation
Useful boundary for terroir and blending research: elemental discrimination does not itself establish sensory differences or a successful blend recipe.
Literature Note: 
Citation: